← Search

Laura Loftin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
137 matches · 83W–54L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history137 matches
W
2026-10-14 · Winstead/Terrell 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Wilson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-10-01 · Terrell/Billings 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauran Epstein
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-09-29 · Terrell/Billings 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Heidi Boswell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-16 · Winstead/Terrell 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Wilson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-19 · Winstead/Terrell 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Meghan Hilleboe
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-13 · Terrell/Billings 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Heidi Boswell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-12 · Winstead/Terrell 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Winstead
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
Default
2026-07-15 · Holtzman 3.0W DAZE Dbls Wed PM · #3 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Critchlow
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-17 · Holtzman 3.0W DAZE Dbls Wed PM · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Hill
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-10 · Holtzman 3.0W DAZE Dbls Wed PM · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Ariel Holtzman
loading the estimate
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-27 · Holtzman 3.0W DAZE Dbls Wed PM · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Dagger
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-16 · Terrell 40s 3.0W Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annetta Bartle championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
91.7%
11W–1L · 79.9% of games
3.0
66.7%
38W–19L · 58.5% of games
3.5
25%
2W–6L · 31.9% of games
5.5
68.8%
11W–5L · 56% of games
6.5
47.7%
21W–23L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
25 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
3 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova