← Search

Lauren Varkey

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
116 matches · 87W–29L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history116 matches
L
2026-10-09 · Jones 4.0W Fall Singles Tues AM · #3 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-01 · Jones 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leslie Marus
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-09-15 · Jones 4.0W Fall Singles Tues AM · #3 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-06 · Jones 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leslie Marus
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · Jones 4.0W Fall Singles Tues AM · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-30 · Jones 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Frannie Benfield
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · Jones 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Jones
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-17 · Jones 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Frannie Benfield
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-10 · Jones 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Jones
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-05-07 · Jones/Marus 18s 4.0W Thurs AM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Parr
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-27 · Baker 18s 3.5W Mon AM · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-20 · Baker 18s 3.5W Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Baker
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
100%
10W–0L · 80.1% of games
3.0
81.8%
18W–4L · 61% of games
3.5
71.4%
35W–14L · 60.1% of games
4.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 45.1% of games
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 54.9% of games
4.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 65.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 28% of the time
#1 Singles
28%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
18 matches
#2 Singles
14%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
12 matches
#3 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert