← Search

Sarah Howell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
High Point, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 80W–37L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history117 matches
W
2026-10-25 · Sarah Howell · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-10-17 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jane Owens championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-13 · Smith 18s 8.5W Combo Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amanda Arkaev
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-06 · Smith 18s 8.5W Combo Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jane Owens
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-10-01 · Dulin 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Hayes Mills
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-09-29 · Smith 18s 8.5W Combo Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jane Owens
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-09-27 · Sarah Howell · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-09-24 · Dulin 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Debbie Clancy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-18 · Sarah Howell · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-09-13 · Sarah Howell · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-09-03 · Dulin 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Debbie Clancy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-17 · Smith 18s 8.5W Combo Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amanda Arkaev
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
86.7%
26W–4L · 66.7% of games
4.0
67.6%
25W–12L · 58.3% of games
4.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 40.5% of games
6.5
100%
7W–0L · 70.7% of games
7.5
60%
9W–6L · 50.9% of games
8.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 53.3% of games
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 50.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
31 matches
#1 Singles
22%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
22 matches
#2 Singles
10%
12 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams