← Search

Donna Burick

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
200 matches · 110W–90L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history200 matches
L
2026-10-05 · Johnstone/McCluskey 18s 5.5W Combo Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Tammy Milani
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-01 · Berreth/Herron 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Krisla Berreth
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-10-01 · Johnstone/McCluskey 18s 5.5W Combo Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Barbara Michael
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-30 · Milani 40s 5.5W Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Allison Peters
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-09-29 · Shivaji 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Donna Esson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-09-28 · Johnstone/McCluskey 18s 5.5W Combo Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Tammy Milani
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-09-22 · Berreth/Herron 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jacqueline Herron
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Gay championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-09-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Gile championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-09-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Gile championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-15 · Shivaji 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Donna Esson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-09-09 · Milani 40s 5.5W Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Allison Peters
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
52%
39W–36L · 51% of games
3.5
18.2%
4W–18L · 35.5% of games
5.0
100%
5W–0L · 74.4% of games
5.5
63.6%
28W–16L · 56.5% of games
6.5
62.5%
25W–15L · 53.6% of games
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 58.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
51 matches
#1 Female Doubles
6%
12 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams