← Search

Amber Siesling

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Randleman, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
108 matches · 59W–49L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history108 matches
W
2026-09-17 · Nall 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Hardesty
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-09-12 · Siesling 18s 5.5W Combo Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Alyssa Fox
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
Default
2026-09-10 · Nall 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bridget Cornwall
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-09 · Dixon 40s 5.5W Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jennifer Page
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-09-08 · Nall 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Owen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-03 · Nall 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathryn Thill
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-20 · Nall 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bridget Cornwall
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-13 · Nall 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tina Dixon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-12 · Dixon 40s 5.5W Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Cassandra Thompson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-10 · Siesling 18s 5.5W Combo Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jennifer Page
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-29 · Nall 3.0W DAZE Dbls Wed PM · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Radha Singh
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-07-27 · Siesling 18s TriLevel 3.5/3.0/2.5W Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Farlow
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
76.2%
16W–5L · 63.8% of games
3.0
63.3%
19W–11L · 55.9% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
45.2%
14W–17L · 51.3% of games
6.5
38.9%
7W–11L · 41.2% of games
3.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 41.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
18 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches
#3 Female Doubles
3%
3 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams