← Search

Bridget Cornwall

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Asheboro, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
88 matches · 41W–47L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history88 matches
W
2026-10-01 · Siesling 18s 5.5W Combo Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Meredith Dunzweiler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-30 · Dixon 40s 5.5W Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Cassandra Thompson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-24 · Nall 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sharlotte Brooks
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
Default
2026-09-12 · Siesling 18s 5.5W Combo Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lisa Simmons
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Default
2026-09-10 · Nall 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amber Siesling
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-09 · Dixon 40s 5.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mary Catherine Hartley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-08 · Nall 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Hardesty
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-09-03 · Nall 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sharlotte Brooks
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-26 · Dixon 40s 5.5W Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jennifer Page
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-20 · Nall 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amber Siesling
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-13 · Nall 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Owen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
Default
2026-08-12 · Dixon 40s 5.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mary Catherine Hartley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 74.6% of games
3.0
57.1%
20W–15L · 54.4% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
41.9%
13W–18L · 47.4% of games
6.5
35.7%
5W–9L · 45.6% of games
3.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
19 matches
#2 Female Doubles
3%
3 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer