← Search

Sandy Cathers

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Elon, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
139 matches · 64W–75L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history139 matches
L
2026-09-22 · Pitts 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with LaJean Morrow Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-09 · Dagger 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with LaJean Morrow Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-26 · Dagger 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Geer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-23 · Cathers 3.0W Fall Singles Sunday · #3 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-20 · Pitts 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with LaJean Morrow Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-19 · Dagger 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Andree
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-16 · Cathers 3.0W Fall Singles Sunday · #2 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-05 · Dagger 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Andree
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-08-02 · Cathers 3.0W Fall Singles Sunday · #3 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-29 · Curley/Ayers 3.0W DAZE Dbls Wed PM · #3 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Johnson
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
Default
2026-07-27 · Rusiewicz 40s 3.0W Singles Mon PM · #1 Singles · 3.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-29 · Rusiewicz 40s 3.0W Singles Mon PM · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams62 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 55.1% of games
3.0
73.5%
25W–9L · 60.9% of games
3.5
23.7%
9W–29L · 39.2% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 40.2% of games
6.5
41.2%
14W–20L · 48.7% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 59.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
29 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches
#3 Singles
4%
6 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova