← Search

Pamela Aikens

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
260 matches · 97W–163L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history260 matches
L
2026-10-12 · Chance 55s 7.5W Combo Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Suzanne Johnson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-09 · Chapman/Partagas 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lori Partagas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-10-05 · Chance 55s 7.5W Combo Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jill Elam
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-04 · Chapman/Partagas 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Faye Halvorsen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-21 · Chapman/Partagas 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lori Partagas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-08-14 · Chapman/Partagas 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Betty Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-04 · Chance 55s 7.5W Combo Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lynn Chafin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-31 · Degges/Whittaker 3.5W DAZE Dbls Fri AM · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Poling
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-28 · Arfeen 40s 3.5 Mixed Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Toni Rodriguez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-20 · Hilliard 55s 3.5 Mixed Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rob Leggett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-19 · Hilliard 55s 3.5 Mixed Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Garland Hilliard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-09 · Chance 65s 3.5 Mixed Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bill Still mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams73 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
54.3%
44W–37L · 50.9% of games
4.0
34.1%
15W–29L · 43.6% of games
6.5
39.1%
9W–14L · 46.3% of games
7.5
20.8%
11W–42L · 39.1% of games
3.5mixed
18.2%
4W–18L · 38.3% of games
7.0mixed
36.8%
7W–12L · 43.5% of games
8.0mixed
38.9%
7W–11L · 49% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
93 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
87 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
77 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches
#2 Female Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer