← Search

Carol Poling

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
127 matches · 52W–75L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history127 matches
L
2026-07-31 · Degges/Whittaker 3.5W DAZE Dbls Fri AM · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Aikens
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-21 · Arfeen 40s 3.5 Mixed Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with A. Kobi-Jackson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-14 · Arfeen 40s 3.5 Mixed Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mohsin Arshad mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-10 · Degges/Whittaker 3.5W DAZE Dbls Fri AM · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Elaine Fox
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-4
L
2026-06-30 · Arfeen 40s 3.5 Mixed Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tanvir Chodri mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-23 · Arfeen 40s 3.5 Mixed Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Syed Arfeen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-16 · Arfeen 40s 3.5 Mixed Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tanvir Chodri mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-09 · Arfeen 40s 3.5 Mixed Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Roy Malac mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-29 · Degges/Whittaker 3.5W DAZE Dbls Fri AM · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Aikens
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-22 · Degges/Whittaker 3.5W DAZE Dbls Fri AM · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaime Hendricks
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-16 · Titzer 65s 3.5W Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Aikens championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-14 · Titzer 65s 3.5W Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jean Pudlo championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
48.1%
37W–40L · 48.2% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 32.5% of games
6.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 33.1% of games
7.5
27.8%
5W–13L · 40.6% of games
3.5mixed
0%
0W–6L · 29.3% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 52.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
37 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match
#3 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe