← Search

Aimee Vaughn

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
New Orleans, LA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
137 matches · 101W–36L · seasons 2022–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2022. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history137 matches
W
2026-10-22 · Vaughn/18/8.5/CWN/XU · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lauren Tafaro
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-10-11 · Seale/Tafaro/18/DIII/TWN/CP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Biehler championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-10-09 · Seale/Tafaro/18/DIII/TWN/CP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Biehler championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-10-09 · Seale/Tafaro/18/DIII/TWN/CP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Seale championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-10-09 · Seale/Tafaro/18/DIII/TWN/CP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Biehler championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-10-06 · Vaughn/18/8.5/CWN/XU · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Courtney Ulrich
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-09-14 · Vaughn/18/8.5/CWN/XU · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kelsey Messonnier
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brandy Green championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-09-12 · Seale/Tafaro/18/DIII/TWN/CP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Biehler championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-12 · Seale/Tafaro/18/DIII/TWN/CP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Biehler championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-09-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elvia D'Orcy championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-09-02 · Elliott Devine/187.5/CWN/CP · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sinny Maurus
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
100%
4W–0L · 62.5% of games
4.0
81.4%
35W–8L · 65.9% of games
4.5
81.2%
13W–3L · 61.1% of games
7.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 56.8% of games
8.5
83.3%
10W–2L · 64.8% of games
4.0mixed
88.2%
15W–2L · 64.1% of games
7.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 59.7% of games
7.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 50.7% of games
8.0mixed
52.9%
9W–8L · 50.9% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
22 matches
#1 Singles
12%
16 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert