← Search

Jay Hitchcock

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
202 matches · 120W–82L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history202 matches
W
2026-10-15 · Davis/Winter 40s 8.5M Combo Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Johan Nordmark
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-10-13 · Davis/Winter 40s 8.5M Combo Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Johan Nordmark
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-10-07 · Parker/Moore 18s 9.5M Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Michael Parker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-29 · Davis/Winter 40s 8.5M Combo Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Peter Novosad
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-09-08 · Davis/Winter 40s 8.5M Combo Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christopher Bryce
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-01 · Davis/Winter 40s 8.5M Combo Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Peter Novosad
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-18 · Davis/Winter 40s 8.5M Combo Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christopher Bryce
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-08-11 · Davis/Winter 40s 8.5M Combo Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Peter Novosad
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-22 · Herron 40s 4.5/4.0/3.5M TriLevel Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephen Keaney
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-15 · Herron 40s 4.5/4.0/3.5M TriLevel Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brooks Jackson
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-08 · Herron 40s 4.5/4.0/3.5M TriLevel Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jason Burr
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-10 · Herron 40s 4.5/4.0/3.5M TriLevel Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brooks Jackson
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
53.8%
42W–36L · 50.6% of games
8.5
69.5%
41W–18L · 57% of games
9.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 47% of games
4.5mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 49.7% of games
8.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
60.6%
20W–13L · 54.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
100 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
31 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams