← Search

Matt Turbeville

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greenville, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
146 matches · 77W–69L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history146 matches
W
2026-10-05 · GR -Taylor (18s 8.5M) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Quincy Edwards
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-09-29 · GR-Haislip (18s 7.5M) Guys · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jonathan Davis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-09-19 · GRRC - Turbeville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gregory Johnson championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-18 · GRRC - Turbeville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Jones championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-18 · GRRC - Turbeville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Jones championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-17 · GRRC - Turbeville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Jones championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-09-17 · GRRC - Turbeville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Jones championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-10 · GR-Turbeville (40s 8.5M) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stephen Reams
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-09-03 · GR-Turbeville (40s 8.5M) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stephen Reams
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-31 · GR -Taylor (18s 8.5M) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Robby Taylor
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-07-08 · Greene Ridge · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with TJ Thomas
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tyler Haislip championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0%
0W–5L · 31.7% of games
3.5
54.5%
12W–10L · 55.1% of games
4.0
53.1%
17W–15L · 49.1% of games
4.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.2% of games
6.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 56.6% of games
7.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 60.4% of games
8.5
35.3%
6W–11L · 45.5% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
64.7%
11W–6L · 55% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 40.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
64 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
32 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams