← Search

Brian Johnson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Oak Ridge, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
209 matches · 131W–78L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history209 matches
W
2026-10-08 · Gamble/Cardinal 18s 8.5M Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Enno de Vries
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-10-06 · Mallard/Browne 40s 8.5M Combo Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Eric Nocera
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-01 · Gamble/Cardinal 18s 8.5M Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Enno de Vries
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-09-24 · Gamble/Cardinal 18s 8.5M Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bryan Jones
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-11 · Mallard/Browne 40s 8.5M Combo Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Andrew Hjelt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-06 · Mallard/Browne 40s 8.5M Combo Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Matt Mallard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-06 · Gamble/Cardinal 18s 8.5M Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bryan Jones
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-20 · Rosario 40s 4.5M Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bryan Vescio championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-18 · Rosario 40s 4.5M Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Shade championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-05 · Rosario 40s 4.5M Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Shade
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-04 · Chapman/Fleihan 18s 4.5M Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Charlie Lambis
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-21 · Rosario 40s 4.5M Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with William Feehan
loading the estimate
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
67.7%
21W–10L · 59% of games
4.5
56.5%
35W–27L · 53.3% of games
5.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 64.1% of games
8.5
58.9%
53W–37L · 53.5% of games
9.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
100%
11W–0L · 71.7% of games
9.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
55 matches
#1 Singles
4%
9 matches
#2 Singles
3%
7 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova