← Search

Brad Falvey

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Thomasville, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
153 matches · 83W–70L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history153 matches
W
2026-10-12 · Yadkin/Ivester/18+8.5 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ranganadh Vemuri
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-10-08 · Falvey 18s 8.5M Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Craig Freed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-30 · Hankinson 18s 9.5M Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Marius Andersen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-29 · Hankinson 18s 9.5M Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with John Hankinson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-09 · Yadkin/Ivester/18+8.5 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Josh Ivester
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-09-03 · Falvey 18s 8.5M Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Corey Davis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-31 · Yadkin/Ivester/18+8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Josh Ivester
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-26 · Hankinson 18s 9.5M Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with John Hankinson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-07-28 · Piedmont 18s 4.5 Mixed · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Mays mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-22 · Piedmont 18s 4.5 Mixed · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Mays mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-21 · Cochran 18s Tri-Level 4.5/4.0/3.5M Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Conner McGowan
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-14 · Cochran 18s Tri-Level 4.5/4.0/3.5M Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Conner McGowan
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 50.5% of games
4.0
87.1%
27W–4L · 63.4% of games
4.5
34%
16W–31L · 41.7% of games
7.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 60.3% of games
8.5
64.9%
24W–13L · 53.8% of games
9.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 46.6% of games
8.0mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 44.5% of games
9.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 28.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
48 matches
#1 Singles
20%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
27 matches
#2 Singles
11%
16 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova