← Search

Jennifer Monachino-Lapey

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pelham, NY
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
327 matches · 201W–126L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history327 matches
W
2026-11-01 · KH:Racketeers:Scrivines · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Meghan Martucci
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-10-24 · KH:Racketeers:Scrivines · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kellie Mee
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-10-18 · KH:Racketeers:Scrivines · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Maria Negron
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-09-26 · MRC:Angels:Scrivines · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Denise Sousa
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-28 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Caroline Dunlop championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Schnitzer championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-13 · CRRC Good Friends 55+ 9.0W · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Louise Scrivines
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · Southern: CRRC 40+ 4.5W · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Caroline Dunlop
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-30 · CRRC Good Friends 55+ 9.0W · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Makiko Togo
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-28 · Southern: CRRC 40+ 4.5W · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Caroline Dunlop
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-14 · SOL:Party at the Net:Casati-Lewis/Ulrich · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Francesca Silverman
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-06-30 · SOL:Party at the Net:Casati-Lewis/Ulrich · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kellie Mee
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams78 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
63.3%
162W–94L · 54.4% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
40%
2W–3L · 45.6% of games
9.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 63.6% of games
8.0mixed
54%
27W–23L · 52.7% of games
9.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 49% of the time
#2 Doubles
49%
160 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
90 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
76 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert