← Search

Denise Sousa

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Milford, CT
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
156 matches · 97W–59L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history156 matches
L
2026-11-02 · MIT:18+ 4.5 Women:Umbricht/Edwards · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristine Heslin
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-11-01 · KH:Racketeers:Scrivines · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristine Heslin
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-25 · MIL: Senior Mixed Bulldogs: Dellacroce · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Underkofler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-09-26 · MRC:Angels:Scrivines · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Monachino-Lapey
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-25 · MIT:Mixed Bulldogs:Dellacroce · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laurent Zazzera mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-09 · MIT: Umbricht/Edwards · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Tessitore championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
Default
2026-07-16 · MIT: Umbricht/Edwards · #1 Singles · 4.5
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-14 · MIT: Umbricht/Edwards · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kendal Gaillard
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-12 · KH:Age Advantage:Gaillard · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jamie Behr
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-13 · KH:Age Advantage:Gaillard · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jamie Behr
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-3
W
2026-01-09 · MIT:Mixed Bulldogs:Dellacroce · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Underkofler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-11-16 · MIT:Mixed Bulldogs:Dellacroce · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edward Wittenstein mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams79 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 50.3% of games
4.5
62.8%
71W–42L · 54.5% of games
8.0
60%
6W–4L · 50.3% of games
9.0
60%
3W–2L · 50.6% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 56.2% of games
9.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 48.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
36 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert