← Search

Lana Penrose

Henderson, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
486 matches · 238W–248L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lana Penrose to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history486 matches
W
Mary Austin / Jan Yingst
2026-09-04 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Roe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
Kim Ward / Pat Struchen
2026-08-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Whitney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Cathy Cooper / Molly Arrossa
2026-08-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Connie Maughan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
Mary Austin / Jan Yingst
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Janet Roe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
Shana Hoge / Randall Largent
2026-08-04 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Zigich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
Loria Sylvia / Trang Pham
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Molly Arrossa championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Stephanie Churchman / Rebecca Fitzpatrick
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Janet Roe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
Lurline Berry / Carrie Rose Lindley
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · with Jennifer Vargo championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
Cynthia Levings / Jim Opie
2026-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Roy Prescott / Cynthia Levings
2026-07-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Keck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
Nicole Rowley / Roy Prescott
2026-07-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff McCall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-0, 0-1
W
Kristin Keller / Kay Higer
2026-07-06 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Annette Barnum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams176 teams · 2002–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
50.5%
101W–99L · 51.7% of games
4.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 39.5% of games
7.0
53.3%
96W–84L · 52.8% of games
7.0mixed
40.9%
18W–26L · 48.1% of games
7.5mixed
50%
4W–4L · 49.7% of games
8.0mixed
25%
3W–9L · 38.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
157 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
154 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
131 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
44 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer