Search

Lana Penrose

Henderson, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
252 matches · 138W–114L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.19
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 46 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.5
57 of 73
NV · 3.5
175 of 228

Lana is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams171 teams · 2002–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lana has been 3.5 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.520192020202120222026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Lana has gone from the 55th to the 26th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.5
51.5%
50W–47L · 51.8% of games
4.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 39.5% of games
7.0
65.5%
57W–30L · 56.9% of games
7.0mixed
56.5%
13W–10L · 51.6% of games
7.5mixed
50%
4W–4L · 49.7% of games
8.0mixed
25%
3W–9L · 38.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history252 matches
W
Cynthia Levings / Jim Opiemixed
2026-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Miller
+0.000about as expected — took 56% of games against 59% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Roy Prescott / Cynthia Levingsmixed
2026-07-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Keck
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Nicole Rowley / Roy Prescottmixed
2026-07-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff McCall
+0.000better than expected — took 58% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 0-6, 1-0
W
Kristin Keller / Kay Higer
2026-07-06 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Annette Barnum
+0.016better than expected — took 80% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Carol Lange / Pat Struchen
2026-06-29 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Roe
+0.057better than expected — took 80% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Pat Struchen / Elizabeth Lassen
2026-06-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Molly Arrossa
+0.101better than expected — took 86% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Valeria Perdomo / Karen Miller
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Rapp
+0.022about as expected — took 38% of games against 33% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
Berta-Marie Barocio-Sullivan / Marcela Urcia
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Rapp
+0.005about as expected — took 46% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
Karen Kiyono / EMELIA ALLEN
2026-05-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracey Willson
+0.015about as expected — took 38% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-05-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Rapp
0.060below expectation — took 20% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Maryann Goldstock / Kimberly Simons
2026-05-20 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly McPherson
+0.041better than expected — took 71% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Rapp
+0.030better than expected — took 50% of games against 40% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.