Teams

DESERT PALM #1

2026 NTA ADULT FALL LEAGUE · 3.5 WOMEN

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DESERT PALM #1000000
2DESERT PALM #2000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Craig Witcher
published 4.5
3.44
Amanda Verba
published 3.5
3.32
Stella Chivikas
published
3.26
Jenny Baxter
published 3.5
Amy Cooper
published 3.5
3.24
Punam Patel
published
3.21
Michelle Castillo
published
3.13
Lana Penrose
published 3.5
3.12
Gina Thornton
published 3.5
3.04
Val Froman
published 3.5
3.00
Karen Hom
published 3
2.97
RACQUEL DIZON
published 3
2.93
Monica Johnson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenny Baxter + RACQUEL DIZON4260% games+12.3% vs expected
Gina Thornton + Amy Cooper4352% games+9.2% vs expected
Gina Thornton + Karen Hom3252% games+4.5% vs expected
Val Froman + Michelle Castillo9552% games+3.3% vs expected
Val Froman + Jenny Baxter1646% games+1.5% vs expected
Jenny Baxter + Amanda Verba9552% games−1.9% vs expected
Lana Penrose + RACQUEL DIZON2639% games−6.8% vs expected
Gina Thornton + Val Froman11655% games−6.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Craig Witcher
23W–35L career · type M · no lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.95
3.5
Amanda Verba
105W–95L career · no lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
Stella Chivikas
82W–56L career · no lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Jenny Baxter
182W–152L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Amy Cooper
31W–56L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Punam Patel
48W–23L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.24
Michelle Castillo
65W–63L career · no lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Lana Penrose
222W–225L career · no lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Gina Thornton
83W–101L career · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Val Froman
72W–82L career · no lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
Karen Hom
203W–143L career · no lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
RACQUEL DIZON
74W–97L career · no lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Monica Johnson
30W–47L career · no lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.