Teams

DESERT PALM #2

2026 NTA ADULT FALL LEAGUE · 3.5 WOMEN

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DESERT PALM #1000000
2DESERT PALM #2000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Darlene Whittlesy
published 3.5
3.31
Melissa Ruediger
published 3.5
3.23
Lisa Krzyzaniak
published 3.5
3.16
Marchelle Locke
published 3.5
3.13
Fiona Yeh
published 3.5
2.96
Meryll Ledesma
published 3
2.89
2.85
Gina Rivera
published
2.76
Jenny Mulopulos
published 3
2.59
Golssa Moridi
published 3
2.53
Maryam Kaveh
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gina Rivera + Marchelle Locke1936% games+0.6% vs expected
Maryam Kaveh + Golssa Moridi329838% games−2.8% vs expected
Kimberly Lukasiak + Fiona Yeh044 matchesnot enough data
Marchelle Locke + Darlene Whittlesy314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Darlene Whittlesy
156W–103L career · no lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Melissa Ruediger
151W–90L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Lisa Krzyzaniak
14W–27L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Marchelle Locke
47W–112L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Fiona Yeh
180W–150L career · no lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
3
Meryll Ledesma
10W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Kimberly Lukasiak
64W–127L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Gina Rivera
59W–80L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Jenny Mulopulos
136W–132L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Golssa Moridi
107W–216L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.59
3
Maryam Kaveh
96W–209L career · type A · no lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.