Search

Melissa Ruediger

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
240 matches · 150W–90L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.36
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 24 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
96%
stay 3.5
4%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.31. Lower than today’s 3.36 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
51 of 139
NV · 3.5
74 of 228

Melissa is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Melissa has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.5202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Melissa has gone from the 42nd to the 52nd percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.0
68.5%
61W–28L · 59.3% of games
3.5
46%
23W–27L · 48.4% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
77.4%
24W–7L · 62.6% of games
6.0mixed
68.8%
11W–5L · 55.6% of games
6.5mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 53.2% of games
7.0mixed
64.7%
11W–6L · 55.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history240 matches
W
Elena Bolha / Brian Vanderpoolmixed
2026-07-24 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Johnny Underwood
+0.000about as expected — took 67% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Tori Walker / Laura Madsen
2026-07-15 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Leticia Schoff
0.021about as expected — took 67% of games against 69% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Angela Stevens / Hannah Stevens
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheri Cherubino
0.011about as expected — took 45% of games against 50% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Joan Chevalier / Kelly Schwalbe
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Charlotte Durisseau
0.018about as expected — took 59% of games against 64% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leticia Schoff
+0.017better than expected — took 58% of games against 50% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Patricia Booth / Brenda Talley
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Charlotte Durisseau
0.004better than expected — took 86% of games against 75% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Junghyun Yang / Jaqueline Schultzmixed
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Ponte
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Megan Bell / Dawn Anderson
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Palichat
0.012below expectation — took 28% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
Pamela Taylor / Tori Walker
2026-05-01 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Charlotte Durisseau
+0.002better than expected — took 71% of games against 64% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Prexy Tamayo
+0.010about as expected — took 48% of games against 43% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Ponte
+0.000about as expected — took 44% of games against 49% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Megan Bell / Nicole Reyes
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leticia Schoff
+0.029better than expected — took 39% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.