Search

Joan Chevalier

Henderson, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
216 matches · 92W–124L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.83
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.0
16 of 22
NV · 3.0
123 of 166

Joan is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Joan has been a steady 3.0 across all 3 seasons on record.

2.53.0201920202021

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Joan has gone from the 99th to the 23rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
42.9%
21W–28L · 47.3% of games
3.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 36.1% of games
6.0
58.5%
48W–34L · 53% of games
7.0
25.7%
18W–52L · 41.1% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history216 matches
L
2026-06-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Delgado
0.008below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Deborah Davis / Carla Kuhl
2026-06-05 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dixie Stephens
+0.017about as expected — took 47% of games against 42% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Melissa Ruediger / Charlotte Durisseau
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kelly Schwalbe
+0.018about as expected — took 41% of games against 36% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Melanie Schmacker / Jennifer Blais
2026-05-08 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kelly Schwalbe
0.019below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Sheri Cherubino / Juli Kochanski
2026-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dixie Stephens
+0.005about as expected — took 29% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-17 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dixie Stephens
0.012about as expected — took 56% of games against 60% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-27 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dixie Stephens
+0.013about as expected — took 53% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Diane Schopp / Renee Blango-Michie
2026-03-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Delgado
+0.041better than expected — took 86% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-03-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fay Gallus
0.035below expectation — took 45% of games against 59% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-06 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with PJ Shouldis
+0.015better than expected — took 57% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
Debbie D'Amato / Rhona Alter
2026-03-06 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dixie Stephens
+0.048better than expected — took 80% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-02-20 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mieko Kitamura
+0.001about as expected — took 38% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.