Search

Rhona Alter

Las Vegas, NV
2.5C year-end 2025
94 matches · 23W–71L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.59
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.0
12%
stay 2.5
88%
up to 3.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 56% stay · 44% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.49. Lower than today’s 2.59 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 2.5
12 of 30
NV · 2.5
13 of 33

Rhona is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rhona has played at 3.0, 2.5 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.02.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Rhona has gone from the 8th to the 1st percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
60%
6W–4L · 55.4% of games
3.0
23.1%
15W–50L · 37.5% of games
6.0
10.5%
2W–17L · 31.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history94 matches
L
Alex Schrack / Kelly Twells
2026-06-05 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbie Quinn
+0.044better than expected — took 38% of games against 26% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Megan Bender / Luanne Balelo
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbie Quinn
0.023below expectation — took 20% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Heather Rosenthal / Kelly Twells
2026-05-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sue Rodrigues
+0.012below expectation — took 20% of games against 26% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Vikki Doak / Patricia Booth
2026-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbie Quinn
+0.025better than expected — took 50% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-24 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Monica Taylor
+0.031about as expected — took 20% of games against 19% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-17 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbie Quinn
+0.012about as expected — took 44% of games against 40% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Candace Sartini / Ani Zargaryan
2026-04-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sue Rodrigues
0.028below expectation — took 8% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-04-10 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbie Quinn
+0.004about as expected — took 32% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-03-27 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ali Wolak
+0.008below expectation — took 14% of games against 24% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Stephanie Stern / Michelle Inman
2026-03-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sue Rodrigues
+0.009about as expected — took 33% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-10 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monica Taylor
0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 27% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-03-06 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debbie D'Amato
0.048below expectation — took 20% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.