← Search

Sue Rodrigues

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
138 matches · 68W–70L · seasons 2020–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.57
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
19%
down to 2.5
81%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 12% down · 88% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.60. Higher than today’s 2.57 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
132 of 134
NV · 3.0
164 of 166

Sue is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sue has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.02020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Sue has gone from the 15th to the 6th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
73.9%
34W–12L · 57.1% of games
3.0
37.2%
32W–54L · 44.4% of games
6.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 46.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history138 matches
L
Heather Rosenthal / Kelly Twells
2026-05-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rhona Alter
+0.012below expectation — took 20% of games against 26% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-21 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Consuelo Kinahan
−0.018below expectation — took 38% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Candace Sartini / Ani Zargaryan
2026-04-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rhona Alter
−0.028below expectation — took 8% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Stephanie Stern / Michelle Inman
2026-03-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rhona Alter
+0.009about as expected — took 33% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacey Welling
−0.011below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Laura Rawlins / Marla Weitzman
2026-03-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Consuelo Kinahan
−0.035below expectation — took 29% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Courtney Long / Raedene Counts
2026-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Consuelo Kinahan
−0.004about as expected — took 35% of games against 40% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monica Taylor
−0.020below expectation — took 45% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Julie Hughes / Celeste Hughes
2026-02-17 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debra Kelleher
−0.040below expectation — took 14% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Deborah Yamane / Jennifer Blais
2026-02-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Consuelo Kinahan
+0.020about as expected — took 37% of games against 33% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-01-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Consuelo Kinahan
+0.022better than expected — took 67% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-01-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Venetia Espinueva
+0.002about as expected — took 43% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.