← Search

Raedene Counts

Henderson, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
124 matches · 61W–63L · seasons 2022–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.83
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
98%
stay 3.0
2%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.0
15 of 22
NV · 3.0
122 of 166

Raedene is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Raedene has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Raedene has gone from the 21st to the 36th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
67.2%
39W–19L · 57.3% of games
3.0
35.5%
22W–40L · 45.1% of games
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 29.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history124 matches
L
2026-07-29 · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Long
−0.016below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-22 · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Maryam Kaveh
−0.040below expectation — took 14% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Sandra Mier / Ani Zargaryan
2026-07-15 · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Desiree Mcivor
−0.024below expectation — took 33% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Kimberly Kehoe / Kendall Harris
2026-07-08 · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Kellye Ray
+0.042better than expected — took 45% of games against 31% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Casey Primmer / Crystal Ziebarth
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kinsey Wolanski
+0.015about as expected — took 41% of games against 37% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Yusria Malik / Hee Park
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Long
+0.035better than expected — took 86% of games against 62% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Renee Johnson / Jessica Marx
2026-03-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carine Tsveniashvili
−0.033below expectation — took 29% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Debbie D'Amato / Meghan Arnold
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maria Dellett
−0.039below expectation — took 35% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Long
+0.004about as expected — took 65% of games against 60% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
Kari Allen / ANN MARIE WEAVER
2026-02-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pascale Diaine
−0.003about as expected — took 38% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
Elis Desiree Peetsalu / Kristin Stowe
2026-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Pierce
−0.001about as expected — took 61% of games against 60% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-01-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Golssa Moridi
−0.010below expectation — took 38% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.