Search

Sandra Mier

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
103 matches · 59W–44L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.98
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
60%
stay 3.0
40%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 89% stay · 11% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.90. Lower than today’s 2.98 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
50 of 134
NV · 3.0
63 of 166

Sandra is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sandra has been 3.0 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Sandra has gone from the 50th to the 64th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
63.2%
55W–32L · 54.8% of games
3.5
25%
4W–12L · 35.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history103 matches
L
Rebecca Dunne
2026-07-27 · #1 Female Singles · 3.0
0.039below expectation — took 44% of games against 60% expected
7-6, 7-5
L
Nicole Austin / Andrea Dawson
2026-07-22 · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Consuelo Kinahan
0.004below expectation — took 29% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Laura Vasquez / Ada Vera
2026-07-20 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Yesenia Arias
+0.020better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Raedene Counts / Desiree Mcivor
2026-07-15 · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Ani Zargaryan
+0.024better than expected — took 67% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Tonya Guidi / Toni Garza
2026-07-13 · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Roni Tarr
+0.009better than expected — took 80% of games against 67% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Melissa Arcella / Robi Hinton
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yesenia Arias
0.007below expectation — took 33% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Karen Hom / Ara Lee Stimson
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yesenia Arias
0.025below expectation — took 35% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
Ann Shah / Elis Desiree Peetsalu
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yesenia Arias
+0.024better than expected — took 92% of games against 69% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Martha Langer / Shannon Demus
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robin Gordon
+0.053better than expected — took 100% of games against 65% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Bree Carlson / Jennifer Roberts
2026-03-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roni Tarr
+0.085better than expected — took 86% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Nourjan Bonney
2026-03-14 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.051below expectation — took 33% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Kellye Ray / Carolina Nigro
2026-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendy Cashin
0.067below expectation — took 29% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.