Teams

SUMMERLIN ARBORS

2026 NTA SUMMER LEAGUE · 3.5 WOMEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-12vs LAS VEGAS CCLost 01
L#1 Female SinglesSandra Mier vs Caroline Walton1-6, 3-6
2026-08-05vs DRAGONRIDGE CCWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesConsuelo Kinahan / Sandra Mier vs Ashley Richas / Heather Rose2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-07-29vs LLVSCLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesBrittany Carlson / Stacy Whitehead vs Courtney Beine / Brianne Pepperman2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-22vs MADEIRA CANYON PARK #1Lost 02
L#1 Female DoublesBrittany Carlson / Stacy Whitehead vs Nichole Averett / Chelsea Gray1-6, 4-6
L#3 Female DoublesSandra Mier / Consuelo Kinahan vs Nicole Austin / Andrea Dawson3-6, 2-6
2026-07-15vs RED ROCK CCSplit 11
L#1 Female SinglesStacy Whitehead vs Shiniqual Washington4-6, 5-7
W#3 Female DoublesSandra Mier / Ani Zargaryan vs Raedene Counts / Desiree Mcivor6-3, 6-3
2026-07-08vs MADEIRA CANYON PARK #2Split 11
L#1 Female DoublesStacy Whitehead / Genesis Garcia vs Tori Walker / Laura Vasquez2-6, 4-6
W#3 Female DoublesDanika Johnson / Ani Zargaryan vs Mayela Moneo / Mary Ann Apone6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Ani Zargaryan
usually #3 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Sandra Mier
usually #2 Female Doubles 25%, also #3 Female Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Stacy Whitehead
usually #1 Female Doubles 75%, also #1 Female Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.76
Genesis Garcia
published
2.69
Consuelo Kinahan
usually #2 Female Doubles 50%, also #3 Female Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
Brittany Carlson
published 3
2.54
Renee Johnson
published
2.53
Danika Johnson
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renee Johnson + Brittany Carlson5353% games+13.5% vs expected
Genesis Garcia + Renee Johnson314 matchesnot enough data
Genesis Garcia + Brittany Carlson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ani Zargaryan
47W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Sandra Mier
61W–45L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
3.5
Stacy Whitehead
33W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
2.77
Genesis Garcia
19W–11L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Consuelo Kinahan
38W–73L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Brittany Carlson
18W–6L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66
Renee Johnson
19W–13L career · no lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
2.54
3
Danika Johnson
13W–5L career · no lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
2.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.