Search

Martha Langer

Las Vegas, NV
2.5C year-end 2025
244 matches · 85W–159L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.41
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.0
88%
stay 2.5
12%
up to 3.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 97% stay · 3% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.35. Lower than today’s 2.41 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 2.5
25 of 30
NV · 2.5
26 of 33

Martha is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Martha has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 7 seasons — 2 moves up and 1 down.

2.02.53.02020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Martha has gone from the 4th to the 0th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
2.5
46.2%
36W–42L · 50.1% of games
3.0
28.2%
40W–102L · 38.3% of games
6.0
40%
2W–3L · 44.9% of games
5.5mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 52.5% of games
6.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 23.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history244 matches
L
Courtney Long / Kinsey Wolanski
2026-07-27 · #3 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Demus
+0.042better than expected — took 41% of games against 29% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Kimberly Cooks
2026-07-13 · #1 Female Singles · 3.0
0.016below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-09 · #3 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Daly
0.029below expectation — took 14% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Geraldine Wright / Erika Cravens
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christy Cropper
+0.024about as expected — took 28% of games against 27% expected
6-0, 7-5
L
Angela Xin
2026-05-30 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.019below expectation — took 14% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Tori Walker
2026-05-16 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.043better than expected — took 20% of games against 14% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Nicole Horton
2026-05-09 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.005below expectation — took 14% of games against 25% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Joseph Engle / Kristin Stowemixed
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lee Jaquiss
+0.000better than expected — took 35% of games against 27% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
Sandra Mier / Robin Gordon
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Demus
0.053below expectation — took 0% of games against 35% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Kelly Perkins / Stacy Sheeley Reyes
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Lake
0.034below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Janie Oceguera
2026-04-11 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.034below expectation — took 28% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
ANN MARIE WEAVER / Craig Weavermixed
2026-03-22 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Victor Pluto
+0.000below expectation — took 0% of games against 41% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.