Search

Ann Shah

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
110 matches · 46W–64L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.56
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 3 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
24%
down to 2.5
76%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 15% down · 85% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.58. Higher than today’s 2.56 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
133 of 134
NV · 3.0
165 of 166

Ann is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ann has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Ann has gone from the 19th to the 14th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
44.3%
43W–54L · 46.7% of games
3.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 40% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history110 matches
L
Tamaris Cotta / Jocelyn Hermanchamps
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Dianne Austin
+0.004about as expected — took 47% of games against 45% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Sandra Mier / Yesenia Arias
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elis Desiree Peetsalu
0.024below expectation — took 8% of games against 31% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-03-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Venetia Espinueva
0.022below expectation — took 35% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Jenni Pevoto / Katie Sanders
2025-12-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Pena
+0.066better than expected — took 86% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Michelle Cui / Meekyoung Lee
2025-11-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emmy Perez
+0.030better than expected — took 48% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Cerisse Ward / Milena Hadzhieva
2025-10-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Civia McCaffrey
0.026below expectation — took 55% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
Yong Mi DeMilliano / Eva Gryczon
2025-10-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Delozier
0.026below expectation — took 14% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-09-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lani Wong
0.044below expectation — took 14% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Megan Johnson / Maggie Pacholuk
2025-08-11 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Civia McCaffrey
+0.031better than expected — took 48% of games against 36% expected
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
Sarah Bolor / Rosemarie Caspary
2025-08-04 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Nadine Kluger
0.025below expectation — took 47% of games against 57% expected
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Golssa Moridi / Courtney Long
2025-07-28 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Nadine Kluger
+0.021better than expected — took 52% of games against 44% expected
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-07-21 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathryn Wilson
0.062below expectation — took 32% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.