← Search

Jill Delozier

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
87 matches · 45W–42L · seasons 2019–2025
Where Jill sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Jill is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jill has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.02019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Jill has gone from the 25th to the 10th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
53.7%
44W–38L · 50.1% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history87 matches
W
N/A
2025-12-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barb Stanley
+0.137better than expected — took 100% of games against 35% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-12-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robin Gordon
+0.052better than expected — took 50% of games against 31% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Sonja Rogers / Jaqueline Schultz
2025-11-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Civia McCaffrey
−0.046below expectation — took 20% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Yong Mi DeMilliano / Eva Gryczon
2025-10-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Shah
−0.026below expectation — took 14% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Jeannie Collins / Tori Walker
2025-10-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Civia McCaffrey
−0.016below expectation — took 41% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Jaqueline Schultz / Anjelica Moore
2025-09-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robin Gordon
−0.060below expectation — took 14% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Civia McCaffrey
−0.049below expectation — took 45% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
Yesenia Arias / NANCIE WEBSTER
2025-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Pena
−0.056below expectation — took 20% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Michelle Inman / Lauren Tabeek
2025-03-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Stern
+0.065better than expected — took 92% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Heather Rosenthal / Cynthia Lau
2025-03-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christy Cropper
−0.024below expectation — took 14% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2024-12-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Civia McCaffrey
−0.004about as expected — took 53% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2024-11-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robin Gordon
−0.012about as expected — took 61% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.