Search

Eva Gryczon

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
160 matches · 86W–74L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.85
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
97%
stay 3.0
3%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.80. Lower than today’s 2.85 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
97 of 134
NV · 3.0
118 of 166

Eva is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Eva has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Eva has gone from the 75th to the 58th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
57.5%
69W–51L · 54.5% of games
3.5
42.9%
15W–20L · 46.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history160 matches
L
DeVita Robinson
2026-06-06 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.078below expectation — took 14% of games against 55% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Hartzell
+0.053better than expected — took 71% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Kelly Perkins / Holly Crosby
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annabel Elliott
+0.035better than expected — took 75% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Geraldine Wright / Erika Cravens
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yong Mi DeMilliano
0.022below expectation — took 33% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Elena Bolha
2026-04-11 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.038below expectation — took 29% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Jamie Johnson / Christina Smithchamps
2026-04-10 · #2 Doubles · with Yong Mi DeMilliano
0.033below expectation — took 14% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-04-06 · #3 Doubles · with Annabel Elliott
0.024below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annabel Elliott
0.036below expectation — took 44% of games against 59% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Tonya Guidi / Jena Domingue
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annabel Elliott
0.038below expectation — took 63% of games against 72% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Jeannie Collins / Francine Mazza
2026-02-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Hartzell
+0.033better than expected — took 63% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Elizabeth Templeton / Leah Martin
2026-01-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hannah Tang
+0.015better than expected — took 86% of games against 69% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-01-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annabel Elliott
0.002about as expected — took 67% of games against 63% expected
6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.