Search

Francine Mazza

Henderson, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
179 matches · 80W–99L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.00
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 39 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
50%
stay 3.0
50%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 85% stay · 15% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.92. Lower than today’s 3.00 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.0
7 of 22
NV · 3.0
61 of 166

Francine is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Francine has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Francine has gone from the 37th to the 69th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.0
59.3%
32W–22L · 58% of games
3.5
43.8%
32W–41L · 48.6% of games
4.0
21.1%
4W–15L · 39.5% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 40.6% of games
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
30.8%
4W–9L · 41.6% of games
7.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 42% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history179 matches
W
Christina Smith / Vinne Chen
2026-07-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Elliott
0.002about as expected — took 57% of games against 57% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Brittany Carlson / Renee Johnson
2026-07-08 · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeannie Collins
+0.018better than expected — took 57% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
Emmy Perez / Julie Brownchamps
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Abigail Cox
0.011about as expected — took 54% of games against 59% expected
7-6, 7-6
W
Brittany Carlson / Ani Zargaryanchamps
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · with Jessica Borghoff
+0.010better than expected — took 67% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Tiffany Vance / Venetia Espinuevachamps
2026-06-16 · #3 Doubles · with Leona Kiely
0.011below expectation — took 41% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Karrie Bennallack / Liz MacDonald
2026-06-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Welch
+0.031better than expected — took 86% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Annabel Elliott / Yong Mi DeMilliano
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Abigail Cox
0.004about as expected — took 71% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-05-29 · #2 Doubles · with Michael Borenstein
+0.004about as expected — took 43% of games against 42% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Karen Watts / Rika Cook
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Nhaisi
0.045below expectation — took 14% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Abigail Cox
0.019better than expected — took 86% of games against 80% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Nhaisi
0.005about as expected — took 48% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
Brezya J Rhodes / Tyree Judd
2026-05-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracey Cutler
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.