← Search

Annabel Elliott

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
305 matches · 119W–186L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.91
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 23 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
86%
stay 3.0
14%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 97% stay · 3% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.85. Lower than today’s 2.91 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
68 of 134
NV · 3.0
87 of 166

Annabel is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Annabel has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 7 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.52019202020212023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Annabel has gone from the 78th to the 53rd percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
64.1%
25W–14L · 57.4% of games
3.5
23.6%
26W–84L · 40% of games
6.0
84.8%
28W–5L · 63.6% of games
7.0
33.1%
39W–79L · 42.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history305 matches
L
Venetia Espinueva / Tiffany Vance
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yong Mi DeMilliano
−0.022below expectation — took 33% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Francine Mazza / Abigail Cox
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yong Mi DeMilliano
+0.004about as expected — took 29% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yong Mi DeMilliano
−0.035below expectation — took 33% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Sharon Edwards / Helen McDaniel
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yong Mi DeMilliano
+0.013better than expected — took 80% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Kelly Perkins / Holly Crosby
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eva Gryczon
+0.035better than expected — took 75% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Jena Domingue / Sydney Collins
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gina Alcoser
−0.040below expectation — took 37% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Venetia Espinueva / Amy Bernstein
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gina Alcoser
+0.021better than expected — took 67% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Jennifer Blais / Michelle Simisterchamps
2026-04-10 · #3 Doubles · with Heather Hartzell
+0.010about as expected — took 48% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
Heather Rosenthal / Cynthia Lauchamps
2026-04-08 · #3 Doubles · with Yong Mi DeMilliano
−0.021below expectation — took 37% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-06 · #3 Doubles · with Eva Gryczon
−0.024below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Katie Sanders / Jenni Pevoto
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gina Alcoser
+0.056better than expected — took 100% of games against 64% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eva Gryczon
−0.036below expectation — took 44% of games against 59% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.