Search

Lynn Row

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
240 matches · 108W–132L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.69
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
125 of 134
NV · 3.0
156 of 166

Lynn is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lynn has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Lynn has gone from the 46th to the 28th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.0
53.2%
83W–73L · 50.5% of games
3.5
24%
6W–19L · 41.6% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
43.5%
10W–13L · 49.9% of games
7.0
26.9%
7W–19L · 40.8% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history240 matches
L
Kelly Twells / Jennifer Miller
2026-04-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Caruso
0.007below expectation — took 28% of games against 36% expected
6-0, 7-5
W
Stacy Burr / Tonya Guidi
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Schoolmeester
+0.011better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-21 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shawanna Johnson
+0.018better than expected — took 62% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-04-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Jones
0.026below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-03-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary McCrary
0.050below expectation — took 8% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Brianne Pepperman / Laura Rawlins
2026-03-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Valerie Valow-Orris
0.030below expectation — took 37% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-03-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Valerie Valow-Orris
+0.036better than expected — took 56% of games against 41% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Stacey Welling / Yesenia Arias
2026-03-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary McCrary
0.006about as expected — took 57% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Stacey Welling / Sue Rodrigues
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Veazey
+0.011better than expected — took 67% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Michelle West / Tammie Meng
2026-03-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Caruso
0.019below expectation — took 41% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
Jenny Mulopulos / Danielle Pokroy
2026-02-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Veazey
0.003about as expected — took 50% of games against 52% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Miriam Jimenez
+0.006about as expected — took 29% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.