← Search

Lynn Row

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
240 matches · 108W–132L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lynn Row to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history240 matches
L
2026-04-28 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Caruso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-25 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Schoolmeester
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-21 · SPANISH OAKS · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shawanna Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-04-14 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-31 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary McCrary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-24 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Valerie Valow-Orris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-21 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Valerie Valow-Orris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-10 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary McCrary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-03-07 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Veazey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-03-03 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Caruso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-17 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Veazey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-14 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Miriam Jimenez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
53.2%
83W–73L · 50.5% of games
3.5
24%
6W–19L · 41.6% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
43.5%
10W–13L · 49.9% of games
7.0
26.9%
7W–19L · 40.8% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
81 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
64 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
54 matches
#4 Doubles
10%
24 matches
#2 Female Doubles
3%
7 matches
#3 Female Doubles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe