← Search

Mary McCrary

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
119 matches · 58W–61L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.03
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
35%
stay 3.0
65%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 77% stay · 23% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.94. Lower than today’s 3.03 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
43 of 134
NV · 3.0
54 of 166

Mary is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Mary has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Mary has gone from the 30th to the 33rd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
50.9%
27W–26L · 49.9% of games
3.5
25%
7W–21L · 41% of games
6.0
76.9%
20W–6L · 64.1% of games
7.0
40%
2W–3L · 41.9% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 42.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history119 matches
L
Sarah Jane Howell / Shea Villamor
2026-04-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Gamberg
−0.070below expectation — took 37% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-03-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynn Row
−0.049below expectation — took 8% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Stacy Burr / Abigail Cox
2026-03-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Juli Kochanski
+0.039better than expected — took 75% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Dorothy Urban / Deborah Davis
2026-03-13 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maureen Caruso
+0.008better than expected — took 63% of games against 57% expected
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
Stacey Welling / Yesenia Arias
2026-03-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynn Row
−0.006about as expected — took 57% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-02-27 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Randell
+0.066better than expected — took 80% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Jordan Wickman / Danielle Caswell
2026-02-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roslyn Katz
−0.042below expectation — took 40% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Dorothy Urban / Emily Alexander
2026-02-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Caruso
+0.004better than expected — took 75% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Dixie Stephens / Mandy Chen
2026-02-13 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janelle Wells
−0.003about as expected — took 71% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-01-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Caruso
−0.006about as expected — took 39% of games against 43% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Diane Sorrentino / Diann Yoder
2026-01-23 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Randell
+0.051better than expected — took 92% of games against 61% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-01-16 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Myers
+0.008better than expected — took 80% of games against 68% expected
6-0, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.