Search

Natalie Gamberg

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
209 matches · 86W–123L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.96
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
69%
stay 3.0
31%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 92% stay · 8% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.89. Lower than today’s 2.96 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
56 of 134
NV · 3.0
70 of 166

Natalie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Natalie has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Natalie has gone from the 83rd to the 72nd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 38.1% of games
3.5
21.7%
26W–94L · 39.4% of games
6.0
83.3%
35W–7L · 63.6% of games
7.0
60%
21W–14L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history209 matches
L
2026-06-05 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Irene Frazier
0.043below expectation — took 42% of games against 60% expected
7-5, 7-5
W
Cheryl Schwartz / Marisa Ptak
2026-05-29 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Irene Frazier
+0.031better than expected — took 75% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Irene Frazier
+0.064better than expected — took 75% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Alex Schrack / Judith Watson
2026-05-08 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leslie Uelmen
0.022below expectation — took 14% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Kellye Ray / Maryam Kaveh
2026-05-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Caruso
0.002about as expected — took 48% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
Heather Rosenthal / Shari Abdoulah
2026-04-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jocelyn Goldman
0.042below expectation — took 33% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Liz MacDonald / Christine LaBarre
2026-04-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Valerie Valow-Orris
+0.003about as expected — took 41% of games against 41% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
Sarah Jane Howell / Shea Villamor
2026-04-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary McCrary
0.070below expectation — took 37% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-04-10 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Loretta Moses
+0.088better than expected — took 100% of games against 52% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Jennifer Wang / Tayoni Coleman
2026-04-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Juli Kochanski
0.062below expectation — took 14% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-31 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adrienne Berman
0.034below expectation — took 47% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-24 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cynthia Lau
0.024below expectation — took 60% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.