← Search

Leslie Uelmen

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
197 matches · 84W–113L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.91
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
86%
stay 3.0
14%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 97% stay · 3% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.85. Lower than today’s 2.91 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
69 of 134
NV · 3.0
88 of 166

Leslie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Leslie has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Leslie has gone from the 18th to the 10th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
57.1%
32W–24L · 50.1% of games
3.5
23.1%
21W–70L · 39.6% of games
6.0
78.1%
25W–7L · 62.5% of games
6.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 40.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history197 matches
L
Alex Schrack / Judith Watson
2026-05-08 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Natalie Gamberg
−0.022below expectation — took 14% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Megan Bender / Karrie Bennallack
2026-05-06 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Roxanne Loyed
−0.003about as expected — took 35% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-05-01 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sheri Cherubino
−0.031below expectation — took 53% of games against 64% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Melodee Wilcox / Jayme Phillips
2026-04-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha Schuster
+0.039better than expected — took 75% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Cardenas
−0.029below expectation — took 8% of games against 32% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Nicole Austin / Vanessa Landreman
2026-02-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Loretta Moses
+0.039better than expected — took 37% of games against 27% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-12-03 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maureen Caruso
−0.031below expectation — took 60% of games against 69% expected
6-3, 0-1
W
Luanne Balelo / Lisa Winston
2025-12-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Childs
+0.019better than expected — took 50% of games against 43% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-11-07 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Loretta Moses
+0.023better than expected — took 86% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Sandra Shearer / Lyndsey van der Laan
2025-11-05 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amrita Soli
+0.028better than expected — took 46% of games against 36% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
Janis Elliott / Brenda Talley
2025-10-17 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sheri Cherubino
−0.020about as expected — took 67% of games against 69% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-09-17 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Loretta Moses
+0.044better than expected — took 41% of games against 28% expected
6-3, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.