Search

Megan Galli

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
265 matches · 183W–82L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.39
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 20 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
91%
stay 3.5
9%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 98% stay · 2% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.34. Lower than today’s 3.39 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
46 of 139
NV · 3.5
62 of 228

Megan is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Megan has played at 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 across 6 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.02.53.03.5202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Megan has gone from the 40th to the 75th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
2.5
79.6%
43W–11L · 64.6% of games
3.0
71.6%
48W–19L · 60.9% of games
3.5
65.8%
50W–26L · 54.4% of games
5.5mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 78% of games
6.0mixed
100%
7W–0L · 67.8% of games
6.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.4% of games
7.0mixed
73.7%
14W–5L · 57.9% of games
7.5mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 46.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history265 matches
W
N/A
2026-06-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liz Jones
+0.059better than expected — took 100% of games against 63% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Chamberlain
0.014about as expected — took 61% of games against 64% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Tanya Hale / Angela Stevens
2026-05-20 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeralyn Marchesi
+0.006about as expected — took 47% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
Rebecca Miller / Irene Frazier
2026-05-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Chamberlain
0.046below expectation — took 50% of games against 65% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Susan Grady / Kathryn Marmor
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Chamberlain
+0.049better than expected — took 100% of games against 66% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Hayley Rodes / Jennifer Hall
2026-04-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Morrison
0.013below expectation — took 33% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Arika Carrier / Amanda Gumberg
2026-04-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marlaina Harris
+0.002about as expected — took 41% of games against 41% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-04-08 · #2 Doubles · with Tyree Judd
+0.031better than expected — took 56% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
Karen Miller / Sabine Curtis
2026-03-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Chamberlain
0.021below expectation — took 50% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
Katrin Dragnev / Lori LaBarbera
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patti Zack
+0.041better than expected — took 62% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Jessica Borghoff / Vanessa Landreman
2026-03-11 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Morrison
0.008about as expected — took 46% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 7-6
W
Wendy Cardenas / Leslie Uelmen
2026-03-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Chamberlain
+0.029better than expected — took 92% of games against 68% expected
6-0, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.