← Search

Irene Frazier

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
238 matches · 135W–103L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Irene Frazier to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history238 matches
W
2026-09-09 · LAS VEGAS CC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Shirey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-06-06 · DTC #2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tina Shirey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-05 · DTC #3 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Natalie Gamberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-05-29 · DTC #3 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Natalie Gamberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-20 · DRAGONRIDGE CC #3 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-05-16 · DTC #2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tina Shirey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-15 · DTC #3 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Natalie Gamberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-09 · DTC #2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tina Shirey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-06 · DRAGONRIDGE CC #3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · DTC #2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tina Shirey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-29 · DRAGONRIDGE CC #3 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie Valow-Orris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-28 · DTC #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tina Shirey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
62.3%
66W–40L · 57.7% of games
3.5
34.6%
18W–34L · 44.8% of games
6.0
69%
20W–9L · 59.2% of games
5.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 81.4% of games
6.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 63% of games
6.5mixed
70%
7W–3L · 55.2% of games
7.0mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 53.2% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
88 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
53 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
10 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
8 matches
#1 Female Singles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe