Search

Marilyn Fenn

Henderson, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
401 matches · 183W–218L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.99
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 33 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
55%
down to 3.0
45%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 33% down · 67% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.04. Higher than today’s 2.99 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.5
69 of 73
NV · 3.5
219 of 228

Marilyn is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams175 teams · 2004–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Marilyn has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Marilyn has gone from the 71st to the 14th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
3.5
50.7%
112W–109L · 50.9% of games
4.0
26.5%
18W–50L · 41.6% of games
6.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 57.5% of games
7.0
56.6%
30W–23L · 54.1% of games
8.0
20%
1W–4L · 29.9% of games
6.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 48.4% of games
7.0mixed
40.7%
11W–16L · 49.2% of games
7.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 39.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history401 matches
L
2026-07-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mari Valvo
0.007below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Tanya Hale / Tyree Juddchamps
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · with Joann Komanowski
0.005below expectation — took 25% of games against 34% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
Fiona Yeh / Christi Lin
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debi Marimberga
0.019below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Andi Berger / Nancy Holland
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debi Marimberga
0.020below expectation — took 33% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Mitchell Pohlman / Tharika Irvinchamps
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · with Luke Nhaisi
0.019below expectation — took 0% of games against 24% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Debbie Hicks / Joni Kerby
2026-05-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jules Mitchell
0.033below expectation — took 40% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
Kay Patel / Linda Hawkes
2026-05-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Ryba
0.025below expectation — took 44% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
Blake Kelly / LaCheyva Edmonismixed
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Luke Nhaisi
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
N/Amixed
2026-05-10 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Luke Nhaisi
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 68% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Christine Ballard / Jen Liong
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joann Komanowski
+0.027better than expected — took 53% of games against 42% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margo Isler
+0.008about as expected — took 37% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Tracey Lee / Yan Uyeno
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Ryba
0.026below expectation — took 14% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.