← Search

Tharika Irvin

North Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
211 matches · 162W–49L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Tharika Irvin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history211 matches
L
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Desiree Kathmann championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-18 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-16 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · with Mitchell Pohlman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-11 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS #2 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Meert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-04-26 · DTC #4 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mitchell Pohlman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-25 · DTC #4 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Desiree Kathmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-04-13 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS #2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzette LaGrange-Miranda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-09 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-1
W
2026-04-07 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-04-06 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-03-30 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS #2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brynn Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
88.2%
15W–2L · 65.8% of games
3.0
92.5%
37W–3L · 68.8% of games
3.5
97.1%
34W–1L · 74.8% of games
4.0
73.5%
36W–13L · 59.4% of games
5.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 67.5% of games
6.0mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 57.2% of games
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
35%
7W–13L · 45.6% of games
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 35% of the time
#1 Singles
35%
73 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
41 matches
#1 Female Singles
9%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
14 matches
#2 Singles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King