Search

Brynn Roberts

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
329 matches · 244W–85L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.80
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 43 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
1%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
32 of 129
NV · 4.0
45 of 203

Brynn is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Brynn has played at 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 across 6 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.53.03.54.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Brynn has gone from the 71st to the 67th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level10 levels played
2.5
82.6%
19W–4L · 70.4% of games
3.0
86%
43W–7L · 67.9% of games
3.5
85.5%
53W–9L · 60.9% of games
4.0
65.7%
44W–23L · 55.9% of games
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 50.5% of games
7.0mixed
93.3%
14W–1L · 68.3% of games
7.5mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 62.4% of games
8.0mixed
63.6%
14W–8L · 55% of games
8.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 49.2% of games
9.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history329 matches
L
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Oliver Tokay
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-21 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Taylor Verhaalen
+0.000better than expected — took 57% of games against 37% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-07-20 · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Valerie Witherspoon
+0.033better than expected — took 50% of games against 39% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
Jennifer Cribb / Mathew Deesmixed
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Taylor Verhaalen
+0.000about as expected — took 48% of games against 48% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Michele Howser / Mimi Liu
2026-07-13 · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Valerie Witherspoon
+0.040better than expected — took 80% of games against 57% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Jennifer Gleason / Susan Norris
2026-07-06 · #2 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Ashcraft
0.009about as expected — took 65% of games against 64% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Shannon Ashcraft
0.006about as expected — took 39% of games against 43% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Drea Jones / Lan Duongchamps
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · with Tami Vannah
+0.042better than expected — took 67% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Jonna Gilmore / Anahi Sanchezchamps
2026-06-16 · #3 Doubles · with Tami Vannah
0.010below expectation — took 37% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Jennifer Unick / Rebecca Little
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Chen
+0.038better than expected — took 67% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Michael Borenstein / Christine DeLislechamps
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · with Tom Gosnell
+0.011better than expected — took 60% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Scott Baker / Rachel Calderon Youngchamps
2026-05-27 · #3 Doubles · with Taylor Verhaalen
+0.027better than expected — took 44% of games against 35% expected
7-6, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.