← Search

Jennifer Cribb

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
271 matches · 111W–160L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Cribb to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history271 matches
L
2026-09-02 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Nhaisi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-30 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #2 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mathew Dees mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-26 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Welch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-23 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #2 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gary Roeben mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-19 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine DeLisle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #2 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gary Roeben mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #2 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mathew Dees mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-29 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine DeLisle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-27 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #2 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gary Roeben mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-22 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine DeLisle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #2 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mathew Dees mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #2 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gary Roeben mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
55.4%
36W–29L · 53.1% of games
4.5
29.3%
22W–53L · 43% of games
5.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 56.6% of games
8.0mixed
56.8%
21W–16L · 52.3% of games
8.5mixed
38.5%
10W–16L · 48.5% of games
9.0mixed
10.7%
3W–25L · 41.4% of games
9.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
119 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
82 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
68 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova