Search

Onidio Mirabal

Henderson, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
299 matches · 93W–206L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.38
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 33 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
93%
stay 3.5
7%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 98% stay · 2% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.33. Lower than today’s 3.38 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.5
13 of 73
NV · 3.5
66 of 228

Onidio is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Onidio has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.02020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Onidio has gone from the 20th to the 13th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.5
36.7%
11W–19L · 45.8% of games
4.0
27.8%
35W–91L · 41.7% of games
4.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 43.7% of games
8.0
26.3%
5W–14L · 40.9% of games
7.0mixed
41.5%
17W–24L · 46% of games
7.5mixed
30.3%
10W–23L · 44.7% of games
8.0mixed
26.9%
7W–19L · 41.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history299 matches
L
Jack Stevens / Hannah Stevensmixed
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sonia Vermeys
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
Alan Mcgrath / Elijah Dunham
2026-07-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gary Trewet
+0.014about as expected — took 43% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
Seda Sargsyan / Michael Deloziermixed
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Diane Welch
+0.000about as expected — took 29% of games against 29% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-15 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gary Roeben
+0.022better than expected — took 50% of games against 40% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shani Ma
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · with Kelley Ferrence
+0.033better than expected — took 50% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Brandynn Elwart / Kelly Elwartmixed
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelley Ferrence
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 30% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
David Holmes / Asad Nawaz
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erik Burn
+0.031better than expected — took 63% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Jackson Olsen / Myles Tiffany
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Russell Terao
+0.044better than expected — took 33% of games against 23% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Joe Leavitt / Teddy Ton
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Luke Nhaisi
0.041below expectation — took 29% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Parminder Kang
+0.022about as expected — took 20% of games against 23% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Michel Dierickx
2026-04-25 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.042better than expected — took 75% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.