Teams

LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #1

2026 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 40 & OVER · 4.0 MEN- 40 & OVER

15 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-07vs RED ROCK CCSplit 22
L#1 DoublesRaj Singh / Benjamin Almario vs Richard Keller Ii / Tim Mullin3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMichael Janssen vs Mike Burgoyne3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Needham / Danny Siciliano vs Jason MacDonald / Adam Neubauer7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesOnidio Mirabal / Russell Terao vs Jim Meservey / Brian Sorrentino6-3, 6-2
2026-02-28vs SOUTHERN HIGHLANDSLost 12
L#1 DoublesDanny Siciliano / Raj Singh vs Marcus Berg / Matt Sinnock6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMichael Janssen vs Christopher Silversmith2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesBrad Cunningham / Benjamin Almario vs Bill Bosnos / Ken Kesick2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-02-14vs DTC #1Lost 13
L#1 DoublesDavid Needham / Howard Tsang vs Brent Muir / John Rodrigues4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRaj Singh vs Greg Farina1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesParminder Kang / Danny Siciliano vs Bill Oakley / Peter Goatz3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRussell Terao / James Hill vs Mike Noble / Larry Malinowski3-6, 3-6
2026-02-07vs WHITNEY MESA PARKLost 04
L#1 DoublesOnidio Mirabal / David Needham vs Michael Springer / Darin Hoesel1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMichael Janssen vs Jose Guerrero4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrad Cunningham / Raj Singh vs Daniel Fogg / Patrick Stover6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDonnis Willis / Danny Siciliano vs Earl Peralta / Michael Holcomb4-6, 6-7
2026-01-31vs RED ROCK CCLost 04
L#1 DoublesParminder Kang / David Needham vs Kevin McPartlin / Chris Stimson7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMichael Janssen vs BC LeDoux2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJames Hill / Donnis Willis vs Jason MacDonald / Mike Little1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRaj Singh / Brad Cunningham vs Taylor Verhaalen / Jim Meservey6-7, 2-6
2026-01-24vs SOUTHERN HIGHLANDSWon 40
W#1 DoublesDavid Needham / James Hill vs David Blank / Marcus Berg6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMichael Janssen vs Matt Sinnock6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDanny Siciliano / Russell Terao vs Ken Kesick / Dan Michalski6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRocco Santini / Onidio Mirabal vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-01-10vs DTC #1Lost 04
L#1 DoublesParminder Kang / David Needham vs Peter Goatz / Bill Oakley3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesHoward Tsang vs Greg Farina1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDonnis Willis / Troy Fenn vs Larry Malinowski / Raul Martinez2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesOnidio Mirabal / James Hill vs Michael Dinielli / James Thomas2-6, 6-7
2026-01-03vs WHITNEY MESA PARKLost 04
L#1 DoublesHoward Tsang / David Needham vs James Mykii Liu / Todd Cox7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMichael Janssen vs Jose Guerrero6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrad Cunningham / Danny Siciliano vs Michael Springer / Darin Hoesel1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesOnidio Mirabal / Donnis Willis vs Eric Chun / Junghyun Yang1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 MEN- 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Michael Janssen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.70
Rocco Santini
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
David Needham
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.66
Raj Singh
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.62
Howard Tsang
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.54
Danny Siciliano
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.52
Donnis Willis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.48
Parminder Kang
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Benjamin Almario
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.32
Brad Cunningham
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.25
Russell Terao
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.20
Onidio Mirabal
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.15
Troy Fenn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
James Hill
published
Michael Gleason
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Onidio Mirabal + Parminder Kang2442% games+2.1% vs expected
Parminder Kang + David Needham8850% games+1.7% vs expected
Onidio Mirabal + Russell Terao61346% games+1.7% vs expected
Raj Singh + Parminder Kang3646% games−1.8% vs expected
Donnis Willis + Onidio Mirabal1638% games−6.6% vs expected
Raj Singh + Brad Cunningham0535% games−7.8% vs expected
Raj Singh + Danny Siciliano2348% gamesnot enough data
Onidio Mirabal + Raj Singh134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Janssen
43W–31L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Rocco Santini
82W–87L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
4
David Needham
51W–47L career · 7 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Raj Singh
61W–103L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
Howard Tsang
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Danny Siciliano
115W–57L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Donnis Willis
57W–96L career · 4 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.52
Parminder Kang
116W–119L career · 3 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Benjamin Almario
16W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Brad Cunningham
56W–59L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Russell Terao
86W–136L career · 7 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
3.5
Onidio Mirabal
94W–209L career · 10 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Troy Fenn
20W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
James Hill
1W–18L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Gleason
18W–24L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.