Teams

SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS

2026 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 40 & OVER · 4.0 MEN- 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.73 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-02-28vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #1Won 31
W#1 DoublesMarcus Berg / Matt Sinnock vs Danny Siciliano / Raj Singh4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChristopher Silversmith vs Michael Janssen6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesBill Bosnos / Ken Kesick vs Brad Cunningham / Benjamin Almario6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesErich Moxley / Dan Michalski vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-02-21vs DTC #1Split 22
L#1 DoublesKen Kesick / Dan Michalski vs Brent Muir / John Rodrigues1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesChristopher Silversmith vs Raul Martinez4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBill Bosnos / Marcus Berg vs Bill Oakley / Peter Goatz6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBenjamin Kott / Matt Sinnock vs Larry Malinowski / Michael Dinielli3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-02-14vs WHITNEY MESA PARKWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarcus Berg / Bill Bosnos vs Michael Springer / Daniel Fogg6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKen Kesick / Dan Michalski vs James Mykii Liu / YuCheng Chen6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristopher Silversmith / Benjamin Kott vs Earl Peralta / Ivan Farris6-1, 6-0
2026-02-07vs RED ROCK CCLost 04
L#1 DoublesChristopher Silversmith / Marcus Berg vs Mike Little / Taylor Verhaalen3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesBenjamin Kott vs BC LeDoux2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDan Michalski / Ken Kesick vs Karl Robinson / Kirk Howser2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBill Bosnos / David Blank vs Brian Sorrentino / Kevin McPartlin3-6, 1-6
2026-01-24vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #1Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Blank / Marcus Berg vs David Needham / James Hill2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMatt Sinnock vs Michael Janssen1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKen Kesick / Dan Michalski vs Danny Siciliano / Russell Terao4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-01-17vs DTC #1Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMarcus Berg / Matt Sinnock vs Bill Oakley / Heath Schneider6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBill Bosnos / Dan Michalski vs Raul Martinez / Larry Malinowski3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristopher Silversmith / Ken Kesick vs James Thomas / Mike Noble6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2026-01-10vs WHITNEY MESA PARKLost 02
L#1 SinglesBenjamin Kott vs Ace Apichard3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesChristopher Silversmith / SHANE SIGSBEE vs James Mykii Liu / Todd Cox4-6, 0-6
2026-01-03vs RED ROCK CCLost 13
L#1 DoublesBill Bosnos / Matt Sinnock vs Daigo Ishikawa / Chris Stimson1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesChristopher Silversmith vs Rajeev Sharma3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBenjamin Kott / Marcus Berg vs Tim Mullin / Karl Robinson1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKen Kesick / Dan Michalski vs Albert Quimson / Jason MacDonald6-3, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 MEN- 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Adam Bilzerian
published 4
SHANE SIGSBEE
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Marcus Berg
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.58
Benjamin Kott
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.57
Matt Sinnock
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.57
Christopher Silversmith
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #1 Singles 23% · published 3.5
3.54
David Blank
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.47
Ken Kesick
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.43
Dan Michalski
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.22
Bill Bosnos
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.94
Erich Moxley
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
Jimmy Lee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marcus Berg + Christopher Silversmith10362% games+12.1% vs expected
Marcus Berg + Bill Bosnos4250% games+7.3% vs expected
Matt Sinnock + Bill Bosnos2341% games+6.9% vs expected
Marcus Berg + Benjamin Kott7455% games+4.9% vs expected
SHANE SIGSBEE + Erich Moxley8260% games+3.7% vs expected
Dan Michalski + Ken Kesick2443% games+1.5% vs expected
Erich Moxley + Bill Bosnos6747% games+0.1% vs expected
Benjamin Kott + Christopher Silversmith5651% games−1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adam Bilzerian
6W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
SHANE SIGSBEE
64W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4
Marcus Berg
45W–26L career · 7 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
3.5
Benjamin Kott
104W–74L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.58
4
Matt Sinnock
81W–94L career · 5 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Christopher Silversmith
112W–67L career · 13 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.57
4
David Blank
10W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Ken Kesick
143W–68L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Dan Michalski
136W–157L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Bill Bosnos
81W–88L career · 12 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Erich Moxley
116W–132L career · 8 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.94
Jimmy Lee
3W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.