Search

Erich Moxley

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
248 matches · 116W–132L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.07
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
20%
down to 3.0
80%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 12% down · 88% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.09. Higher than today’s 3.07 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
130 of 139
NV · 3.5
213 of 228

Erich is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Erich has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Erich has gone from the 15th to the 30th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
3.0
62.9%
39W–23L · 54.4% of games
3.5
40.4%
36W–53L · 45.9% of games
4.0
13.3%
2W–13L · 32.7% of games
5.5mixed
60%
6W–4L · 58.9% of games
6.0mixed
60%
12W–8L · 57% of games
6.5mixed
52.9%
9W–8L · 44.7% of games
7.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 47% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history248 matches
W
N/A
2026-05-02 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.015better than expected — took 100% of games against 77% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Sean Ono / Stephen Gruner
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Larry Gilmore
+0.007about as expected — took 43% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
Adam Miller / Johnny Underwood
2026-03-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Nassar
0.051below expectation — took 20% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Dan Michalski / David Leibner
2026-02-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bill Bosnos
0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dan Michalski
0.001better than expected — took 100% of games against 83% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Robert E Kinsey / William Feast
2026-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Larry Gilmore
0.037below expectation — took 48% of games against 63% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Wade Richardson / Tony Trexler
2026-02-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Larry Gilmore
+0.010about as expected — took 50% of games against 47% expected
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
Gaetano Franceschi / Cj Park
2026-01-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dean Elyacoubi
+0.029better than expected — took 48% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Garth Gamble
+0.012better than expected — took 60% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Ivan Farris / Patrick Stover
2026-01-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bill Bosnos
+0.001below expectation — took 25% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Roger Martinez / Robert Reilley
2026-01-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Moy
0.023below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Gaetano Franceschi / Cj Park
2025-12-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wael Eid
0.016below expectation — took 33% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.