Search

Wade Richardson

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
306 matches · 138W–168L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.31
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 23 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
57 of 139
NV · 3.5
89 of 228

Wade is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Wade has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Wade has gone from the 83rd to the 59th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.5
59.2%
84W–58L · 54% of games
4.0
20%
14W–56L · 38.7% of games
4.5
37.5%
6W–10L · 45.9% of games
7.0
54.2%
13W–11L · 58.3% of games
6.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 52.4% of games
7.0mixed
37.5%
12W–20L · 47% of games
7.5mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history306 matches
L
Patrick Phero / Christopher Tranchamps
2026-06-15 · #3 Doubles · with Enhua Chen
0.056below expectation — took 33% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Bill Bosnos / Adam Austin
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blake Kelly
+0.021better than expected — took 75% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Craig Weaver / Bradley Foreman
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colin Haas
0.005better than expected — took 75% of games against 69% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Josh Haldeman / Keith Stritt
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colin Haas
+0.027better than expected — took 50% of games against 38% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Michael Miller / Brad Davis
2026-05-08 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kent Watts
+0.021better than expected — took 75% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Thomas Paszek / Joe Leavitt
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colin Haas
0.006about as expected — took 54% of games against 56% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edward Song
+0.001about as expected — took 43% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
Christopher Madsen / Kendall Stowe
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Karlik
+0.023better than expected — took 54% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
Thomas Schinabeck / Ephraim Garcia
2026-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven McCrary
0.012about as expected — took 50% of games against 54% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Karlik
0.020below expectation — took 38% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colin Haas
+0.012better than expected — took 59% of games against 53% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Meservey
0.056below expectation — took 8% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.