← Search

Thomas Paszek

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
145 matches · 72W–73L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Thomas Paszek to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history145 matches
L
Philip Lee / Robert Boyd
2026-06-16 · #3 Doubles · with Riley Judd championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-06 · DTC #3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Riley Judd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-05-30 · CLUB RIDGES · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teddy Ton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-29 · #2 Doubles · with Suzette LaGrange-Miranda championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · with Suzette LaGrange-Miranda championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · DTC #4 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suzette LaGrange-Miranda mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-10 · DTC #4 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suzette LaGrange-Miranda mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-09 · CLUB RIDGES · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with AJ Poulin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-02 · CLUB RIDGES · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joe Leavitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-04-25 · DTC #3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Riley Judd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-04-18 · DTC #3 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jordan Raub
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-12 · DTC #4 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Angela Renteria mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
51.2%
42W–40L · 49.4% of games
3.5
50%
6W–6L · 50% of games
5.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 55.4% of games
6.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 58% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
12W–16L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
40 matches
#3 Male Doubles
2%
3 matches
#2 Male Doubles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe