Search

Kent Watts

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
63 matches · 18W–45L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.32
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
59 of 145
NV · 3.5
89 of 236

Kent is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kent has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 4 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Kent has gone from the 49th to the 9th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 47.2% of games
4.0
20.8%
5W–19L · 41.9% of games
6.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 62.4% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
0%
0W–7L · 38.1% of games
7.5mixed
0%
0W–6L · 32.4% of games
8.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 36% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history63 matches
L
Bradley Foreman
2026-06-06 · #2 Singles · 3.5
0.064below expectation — took 43% of games against 66% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
AJ Poulin / Jack Stansbery
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darin McKinney
+0.004better than expected — took 67% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Earl Peralta / Michael Holcomb
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin O'Hara
+0.013about as expected — took 39% of games against 37% expected
7-6, 4-1
W
Michael Miller / Brad Davis
2026-05-08 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wade Richardson
+0.020better than expected — took 75% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Sanje Sedera / Michael Rosenthal
2026-04-29 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Standish
+0.043better than expected — took 71% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Paull
0.015below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Oskar Dagys / Benjamin Kott
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Paull
0.018below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Reynaldo Braganza / Dutch Westermeijer
2026-04-15 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jim SOUZA
+0.016better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Mike Stratton / Henry Huang
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Albert Ferguson
0.034below expectation — took 32% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-04-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wade Richardson
+0.050better than expected — took 86% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-04-08 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Gifford
0.044below expectation — took 42% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 5-5
W
Michael Smoody / John Gillespie
2026-03-18 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with DC Collins
+0.028better than expected — took 75% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.