← Search

Darin McKinney

Henderson, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
289 matches · 101W–188L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.26
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
0%
stay 3.0
100%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 8% stay · 92% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.11. Lower than today’s 3.26 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.0
3 of 22
NV · 3.0
5 of 166

Darin is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Darin has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Darin has gone from the 46th to the 56th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level9 levels played
3.5
37.1%
63W–107L · 46.1% of games
4.0
9.1%
1W–10L · 34.7% of games
4.5
23.1%
3W–10L · 43.1% of games
7.0
48.6%
18W–19L · 51.8% of games
8.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 35.6% of games
5.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 41.3% of games
7.0mixed
32.1%
9W–19L · 44.1% of games
7.5mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 37.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history289 matches
L
Teddy Ton / Aleksandra Szklarewiczmixed
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kenda Nayef
+0.000below expectation — took 0% of games against 42% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Dan Michalski / Benjamin Worrall
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Miller
+0.037better than expected — took 57% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
AJ Poulin / Jack Stansbery
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kent Watts
+0.001about as expected — took 67% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Stoil Pamoukov / Isaac Martin
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Miller
+0.027better than expected — took 67% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Michael Miller / William Feast
2026-04-17 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Roig
−0.006about as expected — took 67% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Steve Horton / Qing Guo
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Miller
−0.041below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Ryan Van / Amilton de Mello
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Izeluk
+0.033better than expected — took 63% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
PEPITO RONQUILLO / Robert Campbell
2026-03-27 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Roig
+0.020better than expected — took 50% of games against 43% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Junghyun Yang / Jaqueline Schultzmixed
2026-03-22 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vanessa Nicole Rowe
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Wael Eid / Chris Marlin
2026-03-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin O'Hara
−0.059below expectation — took 29% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
N/Amixed
2026-03-01 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sara Sager
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 80% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-02-15 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vanessa Nicole Rowe
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.